
David Carson once famously said that he didn't follow the "rules" of design because he didn't know that there were any. In the documentary film, Helvetica, Carson says that he later found out that there was "this group who spent a lot of time organizing things and getting some kind of system going, and they saw me as coming in and throwing that out the window". Carson was referring to design principles and probably, specifically the International Typographic Style. To be fair, the audience for his design in the earlier part of his career was served well by his efforts. Transworld Skateboarding, Beach Culture, and Ray Gun magazines certainly had demographics that would have repelled anything stodgy or staid. Carson's experimental typography "made sense" to him, to put it in his words. At the beginning of the 90's, the transformation of all graphic design to the desktop computer also had the effect of putting complete control of design into the individual designer's hands. Designers who mastered the software could now do just about anything they wanted and Carson's influence was pervasive.
Also interviewed in Helvetica, Rick Poynor said that by the end of the grunge period, "typography was broken, with all rules cast aside, laying in a twisted heap". By the end of the 90's there was nowhere for design to go. "Grunge" design had little real applications or future. As has happened many times throughout history, artists and designers looked back to previous periods. Designers realized that working solely with intuition can be very risky business. That is not to say that intuition isn't used. Of course it is. It's just that we can't all design RayGun magazine.
The typographic grid is a useful tool. But there are times when it can be helpful and times when it can get in the way. I feel a student's good working knowledge of the grid is essential if they are to be a well-rounded designer. Imagine an architect working without any measuring devices, just putting things together by "eye". The novice may have disdain for something that may appear so restrictive. I think it is just helpful to have as many tools in your toolbox as possible. It gives you more options.
To understand the typographic grid it is important to understand some of the basic building blocks of typography. This is what is referred to as typographic syntax. Just as syntax is the study of how words are put together to say things, typographic syntax is the study of how the parts of a typographic design are put together into a cohesive whole. There are four parts. The first is the LETTER, the individual character. Every letter in the alphabet is unique, has its own form and design. Second is the WORD. A word, being a combination of letters, also has a distinct shape but also, as a sign, carries meaning. A word can represent an idea. Third is the LINE. Words are joined together to create sentences, but in a typographic sense they are a particular typeface a particular size, and extend over a particular horizontal length. And lastly, we have the fourth element, COLUMN and MARGIN. Now we are putting type into a two-dimensional space, where we are concerned with spatial relationships between elements, closeness to the edge of the design, etc.

The simplest grid, which many people use, is just a simple affair with margins on all sides and the page split vertically into a number of columns. The modern typographic grid takes that a step further, dividing the page horizontally also. The number of columns and rows will vary with the designers's preference and the inherent complexity of the project. The more subdivisions you have, the more possibilities there are in the design.

One of the most famous examples of grid design is Massimo Vignelli's "unigrid". In 1977 Vignelli got the assignment of designing a system for the literature of the nation's 400 national parks. The system Vignelli put into place has lasted over 30 years and still looks clean, fresh, and above all else, functional.
The UNIGRID

André Jute writes in his Grids, the Structure of Graphic Design, "The designer should regard grids as an aid to readiblility, recognition, and understanding, never as a strait-jacket. If either the text or art refuse to fit the grid, then the grid is not working. Do not force the material – redesign the grid."
In a layout class I have my students experiment with a simple grid. They have to create variations of a layout using a main visual, a block of text, and some larger type, like a headline. Below are some examples using a poem by William Blake. The exercise is designed to use the grid as an aid in proportion,sizing, and placement.



The following are some examples of grid-based design:

Posters by Josef Müller-Brockmann
Jacqueline Casey, director of the MIT design services office, adopted grid-based design philosophy for all printed material for the university, in the early 60's.
Early Swiss grid design...
Swiss Air pamphlet - designer: Kurt Wirth and Paul Beer c1950s
Next: Part 5, Current Trends
Sources:
Meggs, Philip B., (2006). History of Graphic Design.
Müller-Brockmann, Josef (1981). Grid Systems.
Jute, André, (1996). Grids, The Structure of Graphic Design.
Hustwit, Gary, (2007). Helvetica.
I think the toughest part for me is knowing when to depart from the grid - with certain elements - and when to adhere to it.
ReplyDeleteThomas,
ReplyDeleteI would have to agree with you on this statement. I too find it difficult to depart and not be so uniformed all the time. There is a lot of left brain thinking sometimes when I begin to design, looking a blank piece of paper can be somewhat intimidating. Having a grid I found to be very helpful in getting me started.
Cathy Dutertre
I think the typographic grid is a great tool for creating clean and structured typographic compositions. I agree with the other 2 comments about not knowing when to use it or not. Maybe for "grunge" design, or a design with a rougher look you would choose not use the grid?
ReplyDeleteWith your teaching us about the grid, I have steadily started to use it more and more in my designs, and have found my work to be much stronger, and a bit more "visually pleasing". I like how the grid gives me a layout and a place to start, rather than staring at a blank page and absolutely clueless with where to "place" my text, graphics, etc. I find it to be a very useful tool.
ReplyDeleteNot much of a fan of the grid. I feel to restricted, but It's used for a reason.
ReplyDeleteI think the grid is definitely a great place to start, as you said, for people not used to large layout projects. Postcards or business cards are a little easier to play with as far as alignment and clarity goes. However, when laying out websites, large brochures and information packs, the grid is the key to establishing great typographic syntax.
ReplyDeleteI personally love the grid, but I particularly love making the grid asymmetrical. The horizontal and vertical lines don't have to be every 1.25" inches - they can be spaced as haphazard as I please. But, even with a wonky grid, when information is formatted to it, it gives the looker's eye a stream to follow as they read the information.
A few sites I love about the grid:
http://www.thegridsystem.org/
http://designshack.co.uk/articles/inspiration/5-fantastic-notebooks-and-sketchbooks-for-designers
(Web design) http://960.gs/
http://www.obox-design.com/view_item.cfm/title/the_ten_pixel_method (Where my blogger name was inspired from)
- Lindsay
I have found that I am really favoring my designs that are grid based.
ReplyDelete